Conclusions

 

From the above findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. The pretest mean scores of both the experimental and controlled group do not show significant difference. This manifest that the students’ performances before the implementation do not differ much.

2. The posttest mean score of the experimental group is 14.11 which is greater than of the controlled group which value is 13. The computed t-value of the two groups is 2.10 which is less than 0.01 to the tabular t-value of 2.10 at 0.05 level of significance, showing a no significant difference between the groups. This further emphasize that the students under the traditional way of teaching have gained more compared to the controlled group.

3. The pretest and posttest mean scores of both the experimental and controlled group showed significant difference between the tests.this emphasize that the students can learned regardless of the strategy being used.

 

 

Recommendation

 

In view of the findings and conclusions of the study, the following recommendations were given:

1. Either the traditional method or the use of video-assisted instruction can yield better results to student learning.

2. The blend of the traditional way of teaching and the use of video-assisted instruction can be use to add such variety to mathematics teaching and learning.

3. Similar studies be conducted to another group of students to further determine the effectiveness of the use of video-assisted instruction to high school students.