“Human rights have guided 60-plus years of progress by providing a legal baseline for political actions. Human rights must now be the glue in Rio: they must bind countries to the commitments they make. States have an opportunity in Rio to create the transformative changes needed or else fare no better than in previous global attempts in this regard,” is the united message of group of independent United Nations experts who urged States to include universally agreed international human rights norms and standards, as well as accountability mechanisms, in the goals that will emerge from a UN sustainable development forum in June. Working Through Preparatory Conferences in Advance of Rio+20: “Global goals are easily set, but seldom met,” said the 22 human rights experts in an open letter to governments, as the first round of informal negotiations ahead of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) opened in New York. “A real risk exists that commitments made in Rio [de Janeiro] will remain empty promises without effective monitoring and accountability.” See Blogs for Video Latest Report on Preparation for Rio+20 - diplomaticallyincorrect.org/films/blog_post/water-sanitation-solutions-initiative/47867 Periodic Review of Human Rights Considerations/Progress: They suggested that Rio+20 establish an international accountability mechanism similar to the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review, which subjects each country’s human rights record to a State-led peer review on the basis of information submitted by the country concerned, UN entities, civil society and other stakeholders. At the national level, governments should establish their own national accountability mechanisms, including independent monitoring and civil society participation, in order to evaluate progress towards achieving the sustainable development goals. “Science tells us that we are reaching a set of environmental tipping points. We must therefore make Rio+20 the political tipping point. Our futures and planet are at stake, and we have three months to shape the ideas and political consensus that this huge task requires,” Impacting Agenda at Rio+20-June 2012: As negotiations on the Rio+20 outcome document resumed at UN Headquarters, countries submitted additional comments since the initial round of talks in January. The “zero draft” of the document, entitled ‘The Future We Want,’ was based on more than 6,000 pages of submissions from UN Member States, civil society, businesses and others. See our Film Online Video - “Rio+20 – Your Future? - diplomaticallyincorrect.org/films/movie/rio20-your-future/29236. Link to & Copy of Full Statement at OHCHR Site is Below. By Ambassador Muhamed Sacirbey – Follow @MuhamedSacirbey Facebook = Become a Fan at “Diplomatically Incorrect” Twitter – Follow us at DiplomaticallyX See more at our Popular Video Blogs & Current News Event Articles at diplomaticallyincorrect.org/c/war-crimes-justice LINK to OHCHR & Statement: www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11982&LangID=E STATEMENT Released by OHCHR Office: In an open letter* to world Governments, a group of 22 UN independent human rights experts called on States to incorporate universally agreed international human rights norms and standards with strong accountability mechanisms into the UN Rio+20 sustainable development conference’s goals, as the Rio+20 first round of informal-informal negotiations began today in New York. “Global goals are easily set, but seldom met,” the rights experts warned, raising the bar for what the conference can and should achieve. “A real risk exists that commitments made in Rio will remain empty promises without effective monitoring and accountability,” they stressed less than a hundred days before the conference starts. The second Rio Summit, Rio+20, is expected to lay the foundations for a set of global Sustainable Development Goals to complement and strengthen the UN Millennium Development Goals created in 2000. “Learning from the mistakes of the Millennium Development Goals, the new sustainable goals must integrate the full range of human rights linked with sustainable development, and human rights must be the benchmark for whether or not inclusive, equitable and sustainable development is occurring,” the independent experts said Twenty years after the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, and ten after the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, the mounting effects of climate change and environmental degradation have raised the stakes further. Both the Goals and the means of reviewing progress must be based on human rights from the start. “Human rights have guided sixty-plus years of progress by providing a legal baseline for political actions,” they said. “Human rights must now be the glue in Rio: they must bind countries to the commitments they make. States have an opportunity in Rio to create the transformative changes needed or else fare no better than in previous global attempts in this regard.” A double accountability mechanism The experts suggested that Rio+20 could establish an international accountability mechanism similar to the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review, which subjects each country’s human rights record to a State-led peer review on the basis of information submitted by the country concerned, UN entities, civil society and other stakeholders. At the national level, Governments should establish their own national accountability mechanisms, including independent monitoring and civil society participation, in order to evaluate progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. This double accountability mechanism would help to ensure that these goals are more enforceable than previous international ones, and to enable the full realization of human rights, including the right to development. Human rights mean prioritizing the most marginalized and vulnerable in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals. It means that action can be corrected when progress is uneven or is achieved at the expense of certain groups. The fulfillment of human rights is the litmus test for whether or not sustainable development is occurring. “Science tells us that we are reaching a set of environmental tipping points. We must therefore make Rio+20 the political tipping point. Our futures and planet are at stake, and we have three months to shape the ideas and political consensus that this huge task requires.” (*) Read the open letter sent to Governments: www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Pages/OpenLetterRio20.aspx The experts: Olivier De Schutter (food), Catarina de Alburquerque (water and sanitation), James Anaya (indigenous peoples), Chaloka Beyani (internally displaced persons), Kamala Chandrakirana (Working Group on discrimination against women in law and in practice), François Crépeau (migrants), Virginia Dandan (international solidarity), Calin Georgescu (toxic waste), Anand Grover (health), Rita Izsak (minority issues), Margaret Jungk (Working Group on human rights and transnational corporations), Maina Kiai (freedom of peaceful assembly and of association), Frank La Rue (freedom of opinion and expression), Cephas Lumina (foreign debt), Rashida Manjoo (violence against women), Najat Maalla N’jid (sale of children), Raquel Rolnik (adequate housing), Magdalena Sepúlveda (extreme poverty), Margaret Sekaggya (human rights defenders), Farida Shaheed (cultural rights), Gulnara Shahinian (contemporary forms of slavery), Kishore Singh (education).